Carl Størmer

From RHESSI Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{Infobox Nugget |name = Nugget |number = 429 |title = Carl Stoermer |first_author = Hugh HUDSON |second_author = Lyndsay FLETCHER |publish_date = 15 April 2022 |next_nugget = T...")
(429 drafted, possibly conclusively)
Line 15: Line 15:
Kristian Birkeland (subject of an  
Kristian Birkeland (subject of an  
[https://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/~tohban/wiki/index.php/Kristian_Birkeland earlier Nugget])  
[https://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/~tohban/wiki/index.php/Kristian_Birkeland earlier Nugget])  
-
in the illustrious history of Norwegian pioneers of heliophysics
+
in the illustrious history of Norwegian pioneers of space weather.
Both were active during the early years of 20th century  
Both were active during the early years of 20th century  
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oslo Oslo].
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oslo Oslo].
-
Figure 1 shows a well-known picture featuring both of them engaged in  
+
Figure 1 shows a well-known picture featuring of him engaged in  
-
photographing the aurora (Birkeland taking notes).
+
photographing the aurora (with Birkeland, but not the famous one, taking notes).
This led to triangulation that demonstrated the high altitude of the
This led to triangulation that demonstrated the high altitude of the
phenomenon, eliminating terrestrial explanations.
phenomenon, eliminating terrestrial explanations.
The mystery here is that this famous photograph seems to have been taken
The mystery here is that this famous photograph seems to have been taken
in broad daylight, not the best time to see the aurora.   
in broad daylight, not the best time to see the aurora.   
-
 
-
[[Image:429f1.png|600px|center|thumbnail|Figure 1:
 
-
Størmer (standing) and Birkeland (seated).
 
-
]]
 
-
 
This Nugget cannot add much to the existing biographies, but will touch on a
This Nugget cannot add much to the existing biographies, but will touch on a
single scientific item.
single scientific item.
-
For those interested in visiting Størmer's final resting place in Oslo's beautiful
+
 
-
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vestre_gravlund Vestre Gravlund],
+
[[Image:429f1.jpg|600px|center|thumbnail|Figure 1:
-
you will find him near [https://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/~tohban/wiki/index.php/Kristian_Birkeland Birkeland].
+
Størmer (standing) and his assistgant Birkeland (seated).
 +
]]
== The origins of cosmic rays ==
== The origins of cosmic rays ==
Line 45: Line 41:
(or [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rigidity_(electromagnetism) rigidity])
(or [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rigidity_(electromagnetism) rigidity])
as it arrives from infinity and interacts with the dipole.
as it arrives from infinity and interacts with the dipole.
 +
Intuitively it is clear that a particle with a sufficiently high rigidity will
 +
penetrate the dipole field and precipitate the Earth.
 +
The minimum such rigidity is called the "cutoff rigidity" and, not so
 +
intuitively, the mapping of greater rigidities at a terrestrial point onto
 +
the celestial sphere is not simple - the point becomes
 +
a line parametrized by rigidity.
 +
Modern calculations give results such as those in Figure 1 here, and are
 +
routinely important for interpreting "cosmic ray" variations via
 +
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_monitor neutron monitors]
 +
in a network across the Earth.
 +
Almost all of the variability comes not from the true cosmic rays, which
 +
interested Størmer as an astronomer, but from solar particles and
 +
geophysical matters, such as atmospheric pressure fluctuations.
 +
 +
[[File:429f2.png|600px|thumb|center|<b>Figure 1:</b>
 +
Map of cutoff rigidities, ranging up to more than 16 GV.
 +
The neutron monitor at Doi Inthanon, Thailand, is in the highest contour
 +
and has a cutoff rigidity of about 17 GV.
 +
]]
 +
 +
== St&oslash;rmer's Calculations ==
 +
 +
The actual calculations (Ref. [1] and elsewhere) can only be described
 +
as mathematically horrific.
 +
Because most of the computational work was done by hand, St&oslash;rmer devoted
 +
great effort mathematically to re-casting the differential equations into
 +
forms that lent themselves to basically manual numerical work.
 +
Nevertheless, he and his helpers solved the problem for the idealized dipole;
 +
nowadays it is solved repeatedly for realistic geomagnetic and interplanetary
 +
magnetic fields, allowing for their time variations.
 +
As a byproduct, he anticipated the later discovery of the
 +
Van Allen Belts
 +
(see Ref. [2] for a full historical account as of 1968).
 +
Figure 3 reproduces a St&oslash;rmer graphic showing one of his "forbidden
 +
zones" - extraterrestrial cosmic rays cannot get into these volumes, but
 +
conversely they form (ideally) permanent traps for particles.
 +
In hindsight, one might have known that these horrible calculations led to
 +
an extremely interesting prediction.
 +
 +
[[File:429f3.png|400px|thumb|center|<b>Figure 3:</b>
 +
A St&oslash;rmer forbidden zone, showing the characteristic mirroring
 +
motions of a particle that cannot escape; in 3d this zone becomes a torus
 +
("belt") surrounding the Earth and in the
 +
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adiabatic_invariant adiabatic limit]
 +
indeed particles are trapped in these belts.
 +
]]
== Conclusion ==
== Conclusion ==
-
This concludes our series of RHESSI Nuggets on Norwegian pioneers of  
+
This probably concludes our series of RHESSI Nuggets on Norwegian pioneers of  
-
heliophysics.
+
heliophysics, although there are
 +
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svein_Rosseland Rosseland] and others
 +
to think about.
 +
We've only touched on one of St&oslash;rmer's contributions, but it was
 +
a fundamental one.
== References ==
== References ==
-
[1]
+
[1] [1937ApNr....2..193S "On the Trajectories of Electric Particles..."]
 +
 
 +
[2] [https://www.osti.gov/includes/opennet/includes/Understanding%20the%20Atom/Space%20Radiation.pdf "Space Radiation", by W.R. Corliss]

Revision as of 12:39, 20 May 2022


Nugget
Number: 429
1st Author: Hugh HUDSON
2nd Author: Lyndsay FLETCHER
Published: 15 April 2022
Next Nugget: TBD
Previous Nugget: Solar Hard X-rays with Insight
List all



Contents

Introduction

Carl Størmer (1874-1957) followed Kristian Birkeland (subject of an earlier Nugget) in the illustrious history of Norwegian pioneers of space weather. Both were active during the early years of 20th century Oslo. Figure 1 shows a well-known picture featuring of him engaged in photographing the aurora (with Birkeland, but not the famous one, taking notes). This led to triangulation that demonstrated the high altitude of the phenomenon, eliminating terrestrial explanations. The mystery here is that this famous photograph seems to have been taken in broad daylight, not the best time to see the aurora. This Nugget cannot add much to the existing biographies, but will touch on a single scientific item.

Figure 1: Størmer (standing) and his assistgant Birkeland (seated).

The origins of cosmic rays

Størmer solved the difficult mathematical problem of defining the trajectory of a charged particle in a dipole magnetic field. His hope was to be able to trace cosmic rays, as observed at the Earth's surface, back to their celestial origins. This is just the numerical integration of the Lorentz force on a particle of specified energy (or rigidity) as it arrives from infinity and interacts with the dipole. Intuitively it is clear that a particle with a sufficiently high rigidity will penetrate the dipole field and precipitate the Earth. The minimum such rigidity is called the "cutoff rigidity" and, not so intuitively, the mapping of greater rigidities at a terrestrial point onto the celestial sphere is not simple - the point becomes a line parametrized by rigidity. Modern calculations give results such as those in Figure 1 here, and are routinely important for interpreting "cosmic ray" variations via neutron monitors in a network across the Earth. Almost all of the variability comes not from the true cosmic rays, which interested Størmer as an astronomer, but from solar particles and geophysical matters, such as atmospheric pressure fluctuations.

Figure 1: Map of cutoff rigidities, ranging up to more than 16 GV. The neutron monitor at Doi Inthanon, Thailand, is in the highest contour and has a cutoff rigidity of about 17 GV.

Størmer's Calculations

The actual calculations (Ref. [1] and elsewhere) can only be described as mathematically horrific. Because most of the computational work was done by hand, Størmer devoted great effort mathematically to re-casting the differential equations into forms that lent themselves to basically manual numerical work. Nevertheless, he and his helpers solved the problem for the idealized dipole; nowadays it is solved repeatedly for realistic geomagnetic and interplanetary magnetic fields, allowing for their time variations. As a byproduct, he anticipated the later discovery of the Van Allen Belts (see Ref. [2] for a full historical account as of 1968). Figure 3 reproduces a Størmer graphic showing one of his "forbidden zones" - extraterrestrial cosmic rays cannot get into these volumes, but conversely they form (ideally) permanent traps for particles. In hindsight, one might have known that these horrible calculations led to an extremely interesting prediction.

Figure 3: A Størmer forbidden zone, showing the characteristic mirroring motions of a particle that cannot escape; in 3d this zone becomes a torus ("belt") surrounding the Earth and in the adiabatic limit indeed particles are trapped in these belts.

Conclusion

This probably concludes our series of RHESSI Nuggets on Norwegian pioneers of heliophysics, although there are Rosseland and others to think about. We've only touched on one of Størmer's contributions, but it was a fundamental one.

References

[1] [1937ApNr....2..193S "On the Trajectories of Electric Particles..."]

[2] "Space Radiation", by W.R. Corliss

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox